This week will we review and study Classes 6 and 7 and the following cases.
Wilderman 630
McQuade v. Stoneham 359
Ling v. Trinity 430
Debaun v. First Western 952
Dodge v. Ford Motor 341
This week will we review and study Classes 6 and 7 and the following cases.
Wilderman 630
McQuade v. Stoneham 359
Ling v. Trinity 430
Debaun v. First Western 952
Dodge v. Ford Motor 341
When will we be going over past exams in class so that we can have an idea on how to format for the exam and zone in on the issues.
Answer: All of my past exams are on D2L along with my analysis for each. I also have past bar exams and analysis for each. It’s a work in progress as I’m still getting to all of the bar exam questions. I will begin going over past exams in class in another couple of weeks.
This is from the Georgetown Supreme Court Institute. It is a preview of cases on the Supreme Court docket for the upcoming term. One of the cases fits into our study of a part of Rule 10b-5 known as insider trading,
Insider Trading Liability
Salman v. United States
Section 10(b) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the SEC’s implementing Rule 10b-5, broadly prohibit deceptive or fraudulent acts in connection with trading securities. For over 35 years, the Court has recognized insider trading as a Continue reading
I have had something come up. We will not have class tonight or tomorrow night. Prof. Hayes
For tomorrow night we will review (and you will need to brief):
Gall v. Exxon 685
Nelson v. Anderson SUP
Marciano v. Nakash 605
Brehm v. Eisner 634 and 641
Sinclair Oil v. Levien, 650